Why do you want an ambulatory EMR?

Question: Why do you want to implement an ambulatory EMR?

Answers I have received from numerous healthcare provider organizations:

  • “Improve patient safety”
  • “Enhance communication between providers”
  • “Improve efficiency”
  • “It’s where the industry is heading” (my favorite)
  • “Stimulus funds”  (new in ’09)
  • “EMR package offering for local independent physicians”  (new in ’09)

In reality, there have been zero research studies showing that ambulatory EMRs improve patient safety, enhance communication or improve efficiency by themselves.  The most positive studies show reduced infection rates in inpatient settings as well as potentially positive, yet marginal safety impacts for CPOE.  The HITECH act is meant to supplement the cost of implementing an EMR, not give healthcare provider organizations the ability to come out ahead on the deal.  Last, although having an EMR package offering is important, most independent physicians will generally keep their existing allegiances.

Ambulatory EMRs provide one thing: transparent data.  As long as you define what data you want out of the EMR ahead of time, the implementation will be successful.  The single goal of any ambulatory EMR implementation should be to provide the organization with digital mountains of data that can be mined, analyzed and visualized quickly.  The ability to act on this information will translate into an improved consumer experience and a more profitable business.  EMRs are not solutions.  They are tools to make sure you are collecting the data you want.  But defining what you want as an output from any system, electronic or otherwise, is necessary to establish first.

3 Responses to “Why do you want an ambulatory EMR?”
Check out what others are saying...
  1. […] referral.to.providers.  Clearly, not much thought was put into designing this for data output (the whole point of an EMR).  Healthcare executives want to know how many referrals are staying in house and how many are […]

  2. […] improve health outcomes or patient safety.  If you think that last statement is incorrect, read my post on motivations behind EHR […]

  3. […] If we’re being honest, and I know we all are because this is the internet, we all have come to terms with the fact that Meaningful Use is one big heavy sigh of frustration.  Healthcare organizations are spending significantly more dollars than what the incentive amounts to and the only silver lining is that the program seems to be slowly withering and may very well go up in a puff of smoke (Probably after marijuana is legalized nationally).  I still think the idea of Meaningful Use was a good one, but the government decided to focus on the mechanisms a little too much instead of the output of data they wanted.  If anyone thought they were going to come out ahead on the Meaningful Use deal, then clearly they missed my very first post on this blog. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: